|
|
Geomorphology
|
- What is geomorphology?
- What is the difference between structure and process?
- Compare endogenic and exogenic processes. Where does
each get its energy?
- Think of some examples of landforms created by each of
these forces.
- What are uniformitarianism and catastrophism?
- Think of an example of a violation of the principle of uniformitarianism.
|
|
BOX 1 |
Geomorphology studies the landforms that
pattern Earth's surface and the processes that shape them. Landform
refers to any individual feature, or group of features, that are made
from the planet's native rock. Mountains
toward the interior of the Islands provide prominent examples of landforms,
including the smooth shapes
of Mauna
Loa, Hualalai, and Haleakala on the Big Island and Maui and the jagged,
serrated peaks of O'ahu and Kaua'i. Although all of these mountains have
a common
origin,
their shapes are radically different. A geomorphologist trying to understand
this difference would document the structure of
the different mountains (shape, location, composition) and try to
explain their similarities and differences in terms of the processes (forces,
actions, time) that formed them.
While thousands of different landforms populate the Earth,
a relatively small
number
of
processes
build and sculpt
them.
We
will organize our study, then, around the geomorphic process that shape landforms.
At the most fundamental level, geomorphic processes can be separated
into two major groups based on their energy source.
Endogenic
(internal origin) processes
are driven by the internal heat of the Earth, which
in turn results from the radioactive decay of
elements deep beneath the surface. This heat bubbles upward providing
a huge driving force that bends, cracks, lifts, and moves Earth's rigid
outer layer. Occasionally we see this rising energy
empty directly onto the surface in molten lava. Typically,
endogenic forces are mountain building processes.
Exogenic
(external origin) processes
are driven by the energy in sunlight.
Sunlight causes air to move, water to be lifted into mountains
and
ocean waves to rise. These moving fluids attack the solid surface,
eroding it, carrying the broken pieces away and depositing them
to fill low places in the landscape. In other words,
exogenic forces are mountain destroying processes.
Overall, mountain building endogenic
processes act much faster than mountain destroying exogenic processes.
Otherwise, we would not have mountains at all. Can you see why? Consider the opposite scenario: that of Jupiter's moon, Europa. It has a relatively smooth surface because
the processes that destroy mountains act much more quickly than the processes
that build them.
The very slow pace of geomorphic change creates a problem
with studying landform development. Most landforms are the
product of millions of years of change, but the geomorphologist
studying them can only observe
change for a few years at most. Thus, they must make some
rather grand assumptions. At the heart of the
study
of geomorphology
lies
the deeply
held belief that
the
geomorphic
processes
we observe
today
have
been
active throughout the geologic history of our planet, and that physical
laws, as we understand them, have been constant in time. This is called
the principle
of uniformitarianism. Based on this principle, geomorphologists
make short term measurements of erosion rates, weathering rates,
plate
tectonic
motion,
and so on,
and then extrapolate backwards in geologic time to understand
the long-term development of landforms. Geomorphology research is based on the premise that "the present is the key to the past."
An
older theory, called catastrophism, suggested that the major work
of landform shaping was done in sudden, planetary-scale upheavals, rather than through gradual, uniform change. This belief seemed to fit both religious doctrine and earlier geological models, but was dismissed as scientists developed a deeper understanding of both earth processes and geological time scales. Recently, however, it has become clear that occasional cataclysms can play a role in planetary development. Abrupt mass extinctions during the past half billion years, for example, appear to have been caused by extreme events like meteor impacts and widespread volcanism. On Venus,
the entire planet may have been resurfaced about 300 million years ago in a global volcanic convusion that erased most surface relief.
|