BACK          HOME

Shawn Ford
ED299W
Spring 1997

CAT No.1
CAT Name: Tutor Survey
Area Assessed: Tutor opinions
Classes: Hist. 152 M, W 5:30 p.m. - 6:45 p.m. & T, Th 7:00 p.m. to 8:15 p.m.
Date of Assessments: M, W class - 4/14/97; T, Th class - 4/15/97



ED 299W: Workshop CAT

Introduction

I chose to conduct this particular CAT with its associated questions to try to get feedback from the students about the workshops and about the tutoring sessions. I wanted to assess these areas because these were the focus of my ED 299W course. I wanted to find out from the students if the workshops were beneficial to them in ways other than just for receiving extra credit. I also wanted to find out if the tutoring sessions had been helpful to them and if there were any ways that the sessions could have been improved. After deciding the kinds of questions that I wanted to ask, I met with my practicum teacher to discuss exactly how the questions were going to be phrased.

Methodology

I conducted one CAT for each practicum class during the first five minutes of each class. First, I wrote the following three questions on the blackboard:

1. a) Did you attend any of the tutoring workshops? b) If "Yes", are you using any of the techniques? Which ones?

2. a) Have you used the history tutor at any time during the semester? b) If "Yes", what for? c) Was it beneficial? In what ways?

3. How could the tutoring be improved?

I then read over the questions and explained that questions #1 and #2 were two part questions. I told them that if they answered "No" to the first parts, they did not need to answer the second parts. I asked them to be as specific as possible in the time allowed. I informed them that the CAT was anonymous, so they should not write their names on their papers. I then passed out half sheets of paper to each of the students, told them to write their responses on the sheets, and told them that they had five minutes to write down their answers. After the five minutes had passed, I collected their responses and informed them that I would be giving them the results of the CAT at the next class session.

Results

All 48 students who attended the sections of the practicum class when the CAT was conducted gave responses. The results are show in the tables below:

Question #1

     Attended W/S:          Using Strategies:
      No:          Yes:          No:                 Yes: --- Listening: Notes: Exams: N/S:
 #:  22             26             2                    {24               8             18          4          2}
%: 46%          54%         8%                 {92%         33%         75%    17%     8%}

Question #2

      Used Tutor:                     Why:                  Beneficial:
      No:       Yes: --- Study:  Clarify:  Misc.:    No:     Yes:
 #:  34         {14            6            5          3          0        14 }
%:  71%     {29%     43%       36%    21%      0%   100%}

Question #3

     Time:   Speak Louder:   More W/S:   Misc.:
#:    10                  1                         1              2

As the table for question #1 indicates, more than half of the respondents attended at least one workshop. This figure is consistent with the figures that are from the workshop report. Of those students who attended workshops, 94% of them said that they have put at least one of the strategies into practice. The strategy most used was the note taking technique at 75%. The last column indicates "nothing specific" (N/S), meaning that the students did not list a specific strategy.

The table for question #2 shows the number of students who had used the tutor at least once before the time that the CAT was assessed. Nearly 1/3 of the respondents had used the tutor, and 100% of those said that the tutor was of benefit to them. Most of the students who had seen the tutor for studying (43%) or for clarification (36%). The "Misc." column included one each for hints, class projects, and better grade.

Table #3 shows the responses for tutor improvement. The majority of those who responded said something about the tutoring time could have been different to fit in with their schedules. One student said that the tutor needed to speak louder. Another student suggested more workshops, even though that student attended only one of the workshops offered by the tutor. The "Misc." column included more extra credit and clarifying each days' lectures.

Discussion

Overall, the CAT was very informative. I actually found out information that I was looking for and that I had anticipated. The biggest surprise to me was the high number of students who said that they were practicing at least one of the strategies that had been shown in the workshops. Several of those students even said that they were using more than one of the techniques. I guess that I just thought that the students would forget all about the strategies once they had turned in their workshop summaries. However, these strategies were helpful enough that many students began using them.

I asked the second question more to find out how the tutoring had been helpful to the students. I found out pretty much what I had expected. It was good to know that all of the students who used my services found them helpful.

Finally, regarding the hints for tutor improvement, I had anticipated many students to suggest different or expanded tutoring times. Over the course of the semester, several students had asked me if I could be available at other times. Availability is a concern and a problem for many students these days who are busy with work and families as well as school. The two surprising bits of advice that I got were the ones concerning speaking louder and offering more workshops. I had no idea that I was speaking too quietly, and I immediately began to speak louder to correct that problem. As for more workshops, I do wish that I had more time that semester to hold more workshops, because I really enjoyed doing them.


TOP          BACK          HOME

contents (c) 2001 Shawn Ford/ Webb-Ed Press
sford@hawaii.edu