Print Culture and Scientific Materialism

The history of western scientific progress shows that printing was crucial for the development of science and technology in the centuries following Gutenberg’s invention. The strengthening of modes of thought as well as expression based on print culture went hand in hand with the rise of scientific materialism. Thus, print culture embodied the values and worldview of scientific materialism which defined the world as a clockwork governed by physical laws that came to occupy the status of ultimate truth. It was possible to know the world by studying it objectively and determining the laws that governed it. In sciences then language came to occupy a place of transparent medium which served the function of conveying the concepts or laws that could be proved through experimental work. Other ideas that became the governing spirit of these centuries were the concepts of absolute time and space and those of linear causality.

The homogeneity and uniformity of the print medium reinforced the belief in the transparent function of language. In scientific literature, tendency until very recently has been to be as objective as possible. The writer totally disappears from the view, so that the reader has direct access to the concepts which are presented through a text. Such a tendency was also prevalent in literature and the arts. When Newtonian worldview was at its peak in the seventeenth, eighteenth, and the nineteenth century, it was the time of realistic fiction where writers took a piece of reality and depicted it in their fiction as objectively as possible. The predominant method of literary representation was in the form of linear narrativizaiton where the plot was constituted of causally determined events. Flaubert's Madame Bovary is a good example of a linear narrative constituted of causally determined sequence of events.

With the discovery of non-Euclidean geometry, Einstein's theory of relativity, followed by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, a new wave of thinking arose which was based on the field model of reality. According to the field model, one's framework determines what one observes and we are already within the system we are observing. Such a theorizing was a direct challenge to traditional notions of objectivity and caused ripples both in the arts as well as literature as these ideas percolated directly or indirectly into the cultural matrix.