Ionics Pure Solutions
4101 E. Wood St.
Phoenix AZ 85040
TEL: 602-437-1355
FAX: 602-437-9540
Contact Person: Paul Wright
| Startup Year | 1962/1989 |
| Process | GW: EDR |
| Capacity (MGD) | 0.9 |
| Recovery Rate (%) | 80 |
| Pretreatment | None |
| Post-Treatment | transfer to product water storage tank |
| Feed Water Composition | BW: TDS=1500 to 4000mg/L |
| Product Water Composition | TDS=300mg/L |
| Concentrate Disposal | discharge to evaporation ponds |
| TABLE 1 TOWN OF BUCKEYE Total System Cost |
|
| Ionics Water Treatment Cost Including Installation | $709,000 |
| Water Plant Building Cost (Not Including Land Cost) | 291,000 |
| Engineering Cost | 50,000 |
| Bond Issue Costs | 17,000 |
| Contingencies Cost | 33,000 |
| Total System Cost | $1,100,000 |
| * or $1.22/gallon/day of plant capacity | |
| TABLE 2 TOWN OF BUCKEYE Operating and Maintenance Costs of Desalting* |
||
| Item | Cost Per Year | Cost per 1,000 Gallon |
| Electrical Costs/EDR System, Well Pumps, Building, Lighting, etc. | $85,000 | $0.66 |
| Labor, Operating, & Maintenance | 34,000 | 0.26 |
| Miscellaneous (Chemicals, Insurance, Repairs to Building, Auditing, etc.) | 14,000 | 0.11 |
| Bond Amortization | 125,000 | 0.97 |
| Future Reserve | 0 | 0 |
| Total Operating & Maintenance Costs | $258,000 | $2.00 |
| *Based on actual 1988 production of 129,000,000 gallons | ||
Abstract
In 1962 the Town of Buckeye, Arizona became the first U.S. community to treat all of its
municipal water supply by desalting. This electrodialysis (ED) desalting plant had a
capacity of 650,000 GPD and operated continuously until 1988 when the town installed a new
900,000 GPD Electrodialysis Reversal (EDR) system. This paper will review the Town of
Buckeye water requirements, the needs for desalting the municipal supply, and the total
system cost including operating and maintenance costs. Operational characteristics will be
discussed based on data from the new EDR system such as flow rates, monthly water
analysis, water recovery and applied power.
The Need for Desalination
Buckeye, Arizona, is a quintessential small town America. Its 4,000 residents reside
mainly in a one square mile townsite surrounded by some of the world's most productive
cottonfarming country. Located about 35 miles west of Phoenix, the area enjoys a mild
winter and hot summer climate with only about seven (7) inches of rainfall annually. It is
served by an excellent transportation network and lies along major routes from Phoenix to
San Diego and Los Angeles. It is known for its warm, friendly people and family-oriented
lifestyle.
Despite Buckeye's numerous advantages, however, water quality remains a problem. (Please note that I emphasized the word "quality." Even though it is situated in a water scarce desert, geological conditions of the Salt River/Gila River Valley have blessed the community with a high water table, so high in fact that the Buckeye Irrigation Company has to operate dewatering wells to prevent waterlogging of thousands of acres of prime farmland.) All of the water used for domestic purposes in the Buckeye area comes from wells or bottlesno surface water is available. Almost all of the well water, although organically safe, is loaded with minerals. Typical well salinity varies from 1,500 to 4,000 ppm TDS, which at best is more than three times the Federal standard. Salty water ruins pipes and appliances, contains unhealthy quantities of some minerals and just plain tastes bad.
History of Desalination in Buckeye
In 1958 a study committee appointed by the Buckeye Town Council told elected
officials what everybody already knewthe water was bad. The next two years were
spent in studying the problem from all aspects. It was decided after surveying available
technology and companies building systems, that the lonics, Inc. electrodialysis (ED)
system would be best for Buckeye. A lengthy educational effort was launched, culminating
in a 2 to 1 positive vote on a $300,000 bond issue to build Arizona's first municipal
desalination plant, which was completed in 1962.
The plant continued to operate effectively for about 20 years. By the early 1980's, the combination of growth and age of equipment made it obvious that a new plant was needed. In 1987, a $1.1 million bond issue, part of a $3.3 million dollar election which also included sewage treatment improvements, was approved, again by a 2 to 1 margin. The new desalting plant began operating in January 1988, the year following final retirement of the 1962 bond issue. The new Electrodialysis Reversal (EDR) facility stands right next to the 1962 plant, which has been converted to an auto maintenance shop.
|
The simplified EDR flow diagram for the Aquamite system is shown on Figure 3. This diagram shows the major hydraulic components for either Aquamite system including the feed pump, the concentrate pump, the automatic motor operated valves (for inlet, outlet and control of the product TDS), the concentrate recycle line, and a membrane stack. The Aquamite XX has two (2) lines, each having three (3) stages producing 300,000 GPD of product water. The Aquamite 50 has three (3) lines, each having three (3) stages and has a product water capacity of 600,000 GPD. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Unit size (LxWxH): 10 x 2 x 3 Meters
(32 x 7 x 10 Feet)
Hydraulics:
Feed Flow (max): 1800 M^3/day
(475,000 USGPD)
Product Flow (max): 1150 M^3/day
(300,000 USGPD)
Pumps:
Feed: 30 HP - Ductile iron case
with stainless steel trim
Concentrate: 15 HP - All
stainless steel
Membrane Stack:
Anion/Cation Membranes: Ionics 46 x 102 Cm (18 x 40 inches)
Water Flow Spacers: Ionics tortuous path, polyethylene
Electric Power:
480/460/380/220 Volts, 50/60 Hz, 3 phase
Total Load: - Variable with application
DC Power: 3 phase, full wave, silicon diode rectifiers with 5% ripple (max)
FOR APPLICATION AND DESIGN INFORMATION
Address:
65 Grove Street
PO Box 9131
Watertown, MA 02272-9131
Phone:
(617) 926-2500
Web site: http:/www.ionics.com