October 17-18, 2003

Marriott Hotel

Judi Kirkpatrick, Bob Franco, John Rand, Leon Richards

Report for STEM QEM Workshop

Pre Contact with Workshop

Bob Franco notified KapCC team and QEM Workshop leaders of our intent to participate.

Leadership in STEM/NSF/QEM

QEM = Quality Education for Minorities. They received a three year leadership grant to help TCUP planning grant recipients to further develop the implementation grant proposal.

Contact staff leaders.

Dr. Shirley M. McBay, Project Director

Dr. J. Arthur Jones, Senior Associate

Ms. Althea Burns, Associate

QEM Network 1818 N Street, NW, Suite 350

Washington DC 20036

202-659-1818 (o)   202-659-5408 (fax)

QEM website STEM initiatives

http://qemnetwork.qem.org/mse.html

Get campus mission, catalogue.

The Quality Education for Minorities  (QEM) Network has received a three-year grant from the National Science Foundation in support of leadership development in Science,  Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) at the Nation's  Tribal Colleges. QEM's project is designed to further the goals  of the Foundation's  Tribal Colleges and  Universities Program (TCUP) .While the project's proposed   activities focus on Tribal Colleges due to the particular challenges     they face, all institutions eligible for TCUP will be invited     to participate in project activities

 

 

When at workshop

Overview

TCUP Goals

Shirley McBay

Dr. McBay spoke on tcup goals in curriculum, faculty professional development, undergraduate research and community service opportunities, academic enrichment, infusion of technology to enhance STEM instruction, collaborations, support for students, ("What are they going to do?"), and other activities for instruction, as being key ingredients in an implementation grant proposal.

New courses

Shirley McBay

Is the course being introduced, modified or replaced?

What are innovative pedagogical strategies, techniques, or practices to be incorporated?

**Build on and develop awareness of what others have done and give evidence (references) that show we have done this.

**If techniques and practices have been shown effective elsewhere that we plan to adapt or modify, show evidence of our awareness of that.

Have plans for assessing what we're proposing.

Have courses that have the potential for replication.

Faculty Development

Shirley McBay`

Describe and Identify:

# faculty involved, department of faculty to be trained/prepared, nature of training/preparation

Describe and Identify:

Extend members of STEM and science education have participated in "joint planning."

# of faculty in professional development on acquiring of enhanced disciplinary competency and currency

Amount of project funds to support faculty release time, support staff, course load reduction, and research/teaching assistance to enable faculty to engaged in institutional reform

ID=Kemameha for "How to teach Hawaiian students"

Buy out of course to mentor students?

Development Plan that includes students going to professional meetings, giving poster sessions, being critiqued.

 

Student Learning

Shirley McBay

Current/projected # of minority STEM in actual supervised research

Current/projected # of minority STEM  students receiving financial support.

Expected gpa for students in STEM: 3.0

30%=equipment for labs/classrooms, linked to plan

Goals, Objectives, Timeline

Shirley McBay

3 goals with 6 objectives that are measurable

Status current STEM infrastructure

Existing Research about underrepresented minorities

Show yearly objectives in numbers

Impact of STEM offerings on Institution

Management Structure: communicate throughout institution.  How will we keep everyone informed?

Difference of 5 years on institution

Advisory Committee (6-8  meet 2x/year in year 1.  Promote in communities, give them an honorarium of $425/day)

Strong formative and substantive Evaluation as the project unfolds

Evidence of Institutional Commitment

External Evaluator for Independent Assessment annually. Internal Evaluator/data manager

Decide who these people will be.

Others paid in the grant:

PI

Full-time manager, day by day

Data collector

Internal Advisory committee

Someone from the budget office

Hold regular meetings with all

 

Weakness of non-funded proposals

J. Arthur Jones

Spelling/grammar errors

Make every sentence count.  See page 7 of tcup guidelines. 

Goals unclear, no measurable objectives.

Strategies to meet objectives is the essence of what people look at:

Strategies:  What will we do?

Key: course, faculty, time period, how

Key: show experience we or others have had.  ID strategies that will work.

Target audience: which students, which faculty?

HAVE MORE THAN MINIMAL SUPPORT FOR STUDENTS FOR RESEARCH AND PAPERS AND MEETINGS

Budget narrative

Cost-effective

Baseline data

Current students starting from

Cite research that has worked

How do we show things have worked?

Sustainability: Adapt or Expand

How will we disseminate Results

Newletters, Pacific Ccs, website, conference papers, other NSFNASA foundations.  How do we tie thie with others?

Describe this in proposal

Reviewers will not find out about KapCC unless we include a brief profile.

Need Evaluation plan.

Reviewers: what do they do?

J. Arthur Jones

  1. Start in good mood  ++ attitude
  2. little things: deadline, within guidelines, technical aspects, # of appendices, eligibility to apply?
  3. Categories with points
  4. Logical, well-developed
  5. Show creative and unique approaches to meet needs.  Show other successes.
  6. Integrity
  7. Originality, not cut/paste of other proposals
  8. Signify # of students and researchers
  9. Serve to increase access to education, remove barriers, recruit indigenous into STEM
  10. Geography is major issue, urban/rural/remove/native cultural approach is valid and honored way.
  11. Strategic partnerships
  12. Cultural understanding and sensitivity to Hawaiian culture.  Sensitive, not exploitative.
  13. Letters of support, scanned in and part of application w/letterhead.  Not emails.

MERIT REVIEW CRITERIA

J. Arthur Jones

PROJECT MUST HAVE:

INTELLECTUAL MERIT

BROADER IMPACT

This needs to be in the executive summary and in HEADLINES throughout proposal.

Merit Review

Intellectual merit

J. Arthur Jones

Advance knowledge and understanding

Qualified key Personnel

Creative and unique

Well-conceived and organized

Has needed resources

"Hypothesis to NSF"

ok to fail

advancing knowledge

Annual Progress Report

"Cooperative Agreement"

Merit Review

Broader Impact

J. Arthur Jones

Promote teaching, training and learning

Broadens participation of underrepresented groups

Enhance infrastructure for research and education

Broadley disseminated

Societal Benefits

Suggestions from J.Arthur

Parents in QEM, M&SC to parents w/NSF stipend, minimum wage, 4xyear/2 1/2 days

ID students early in pipeline

ID Target Audience,

Neighborhood Education Watch, see Jacksonville FLA PTATC/PSIC

Charter Schools, Hawaiian Civic Clubs, other non-traditional places

General ideas/discussions

UHHilo

Hawaii Public Helath w/400 positions

Pap Olelo Kahi/Traditional Healing

Dr. Fukino, Department of Public Health

CNAJ

Kamanao Crabbe, Clinical Psych

TSET

EXCITE CAMP

Apply for other NSF grants!

Budgets and TSET Evaluation Tool

Submission through NSF Fastlane Tool