Jump to end for links to related documents

THE THEME OF THE IPSA WORLD CONGRESS 2000:

GLOBALIZATION OR WORLD CAPITALISM


GLOBALIZATION IS A FUZZY TERM

BUT IT MAY CONVEY SPECIFIC MEANINGS

By Fred W. Riggs

Some reflections concerning a COCTA-sponsored panel on Globalization to be held at the next
Congress of the International Political Science Association, in Quebec, August 2000.

NOTE: This memo was posted in July 1999 when preliminary planning for a Roundtable on concepts of Globalization at the IPSA Congress first started. The project is now formally launched and details about participants and methodology can be found separately at COCTAGLO


The first of the five major themes of the 2000 IPSA Congress in Quebec -- as given in the Program Committee's announcement -- is called: GLOBALIZATION, SOVEREIGNTY AND LEGITIMACY. For details, see: IPSA Program for Quebec Congress, August 2000. The third paragraph of the accompanying text contains this explanation:

The changes in question have increasingly been treated under the rubric of "globalization"; a catch-all phrase which emphasizes the emergence of a truly global economy along with the spread of Western values and institutions. By shifting the emphasis from "globalization" to "world capitalism", and by specifically focusing on the corporate aspect of change, the main theme of the Quebec Congress highlights the organizational and goal-oriented dimension of the process.

The term, catch-all phrase, as used here, suggests the difficulty many political scientists have already experienced with the use of a word that has become so popularized that it has already lost whatever specific meaning it may have had at first. We are naturally inclined, in the presence of such popular buzzwords, to reject them and propose substitutes that more precisely express our meaning -- in this case, Prof. Lafferty suggests that world capitalism can better indicate what members of the Program Committee have in mind. Unfortunately, this procedure may create as many difficulties as it solves. Consider the following problems.

1. First, the new term may be as problematic as the displaced one. In this case capitalism is, itself, a buzzword that has been the focus of heated controversies, and the addition of world as a modifier scarcely makes the term any clearer. George Soros, a billionaire who has made his fortune by money market speculations -- he may or may not be a capitalist, depending on how one defines this term -- has written a lot about the growing dangers caused by world capitalism -- see: Soros In the process of globalization, the meaning of capitalism has shifted drastically from its small-scale entrepreneurial origins to its mega-scale supra-state manifestations in the global flow of speculative money-market transactions in which entrepreneurial productivity is scarcely an important consideration.

2. A second problem arises when a broad multi-disciplinary concept is replaced by a more narrowly focused term. In this case, globalization is surely a multi-faceted process, not only with deep economic aspects, but also political, social, cultural, environmental, historical and geographical implications, putting into jeopardy all the established boundaries of Social Science By contrast, although capitalism clearly has political connotations, the word's focus on money and entrepreneurship suggests a kind of economic determinism.

Political scientists -- they may want to invert this perspective and ask how public policy decisions influence economic development or may regulate market forces -- are handicapped by the rhetoric of political-economy that typically makes politics a dependent variable. One advantage of globalization is that it overcomes this bias: it permits one to view the planetary spread of trade, markets, and industry as both a consequence and a cause of contemporary world affairs, using the model of circular causation rather than unilinear thinking. When modern states adopt policies that open or restrict the flow of goods, capital, and people, these political decisions have profound economic consequences -- surely political scientists should not rush to conclude that they are predetermined by economic forces.

3. A third problem I see in the program plan involves the assumption that globalization implies "the spread of Western values and institutions". IPSA members from many third world countries are well aware of powerful movements in their own countries that have emerged to combat Westernization and to resist its penetration. Even within the Western world, globalization has spawned movements to revive traditional values and practices and to counteract the more negative aspects of capitalism and materialism. Surely globalization does not compel homogenization -- instead, increasing diversity may be viewed as a normal response to unwelcome global pressures.

It is surely a misunderstanding of globalization to see it as a euphemism for Westernization. Consider some of the older terms like progress and development. Each had strong positive connotations that were rejected by critics who pointed to their unhappy consequences. One of the attractive features of globalization as a replacement for these earlier terms is its value neutrality -- it points to a fact of life in the world today that has both positive and negative consequences. It can, therefore, be studied empirically without presuppositions or any implied determinism. It is as important to explain the causes -- economic, political, social, psychological, geographical and historical -- of globalization as it is to look at its many consequences. One way to interpret this phenomenon rests on a reassessment of Area Studies as a tool for understanding how conquered and liberated peoples respond to the impact of the West in their lives.

4. Speaking terminologically, we can see that globalization is a kind of "shelter" or "umbrella" under which a congeries of overlapping and linked concepts can be subsumed. In context, however, one can use globalization to refer precisely to any one of these concepts but without such contextual markers the word is easily misunderstood. An everyday example might be the word mother which originally, no doubt, referred only to birth mothers, but has cone to include also "step mothers," "foster mothers," "surrogate mothers," etc. When the word is used in a fuzzy way to cover all these diverse relationships, it become highly ambiguous, but the use of more specific terms permits one to focus on different kinds of motherly relationships. In context, therefore, one can use mother to refer precisely to any one of several overlapping concepts, or to any combination of these relationships. Without such indicators, however, the word gives only a fuzzy impression which, of course, may well be all that is needed in a particular situation.

The same is true of globalization. Under the aegis of the International Sociological Association, Henry Teune and I launched a project last year which involved the analysis of texts from the work of many ISA members who had written about "globalization". The results are reported in a document that can beviewed at Concepts . It provided the basis for a Roundtable at the last ISA Congress in Montreal. COCTA plans to replicate that exercise at the Quebec IPSA Congress. Anyone using the term globalization in a research project or in the title of a paper prepared for presentation in Quebec, is invited to participate. Just contact Fred Riggs and express an interest in the project -- if possible, also send a text showing what one has in mind when speaking about globalization. The texts will be copied into a corpus and made the basis for subsequent analysis and discussion by all participants in the project.


Quebec Congress Plans [] Roundtable on Globalization || COCTA Sessions at Quebec Congress || COCTA Home Page []

Related Globalization Links [] Classified concepts || Explanation || Sites || Projects []

Return to top of this page or click here for Home Page links:

Personal Autobio Prism GRD Globalization Concepts Ethnicity ETHNIC-L COCTA Onoma. COVICO Choices Impeach
SITES
Search Engines

Updated: 14 February 2000