Questions Relating to David Stannard's Before
the Horror
1.
What
was Lieutenant James King's population estimate of Hawaii in 1778-79? How did
he come up with that figure? (pp. 3-4)
2.
What
were the population estimates given by Bligh, Dixon, and Golovnin? When did
each of these men visit the islands? What are some of the problems with each of
their estimates? (pp. 4-8)
3.
Why
does Stannard question the use of William Bayly's 1778 estimate of NiÔihau's
population? (pp. 8-9)
4.
What
does Stannard say about the environmental conditions of KahoÔolawe in pre-haole
times? (pg. 10)
5. What does Stannard say about the size
of the population on LanaÔi? (pp. 10-12)
6.
Why
is it difficult to estimate the population of Kealakekua Bay based on house-counting?
(pp. 13-16)
7.
Why
can't we assume that the population density at Kealakekua is reflective of all
coastal areas? Discuss Stannard's argument on leeward vs. windward settlement.
(pp. 16-22)
8.
Why
does King believe a quarter of the islands' coastlines were uninhabited? Is
this a correct assessment? (pp. 23-25)
9.
Why
does King believe that the interior parts of the islands were uninhabited? Is
this a correct assessment? (pp. 25-26)
10.What is the procedure that has Òundergirded every previous
estimateÓ and of which Stannard is critical? (pg. 31)
Discussion
Question
There are
those in the scholarly community who do not agree with Stannard's raising of
the 1778 population estimate from the previously accepted 300,000 to
approximately 800,000. What do you think?
Think/Write Question
Do you think Stannard's
pre-contact population estimate has been used in the political debates of
modern Hawaii? Why do you think the numbers are so important to Hawaiian
activists today?