Ling 423/640G: Cognitive Linguistics
Ben Bergen
Meeting 4: Polysemy and
homonymy
September
4, 2008
One
of the first things we find when looking at word meaning is that a given word
may have multiple meanings or senses. Today we're going to look at
multiple meanings - polysemy
and homonymy.
An
example: The winning joke from Laughlab's world's
funniest joke competition.
A couple of New
Jersey hunters are out in the woods when one of them falls to the ground. He
doesn't seem to be breathing, his eyes are rolled back
in his head. The other guy whips out his cell phone and calls the emergency
services. He gasps to the operator: “My friend is dead! What can I do?” The
operator, in a calm soothing voice says: “Just take it easy. I can help. First,
let's make sure he's dead.” There is a silence, then a
shot is heard. The guy's voice comes back on the line. He says: “OK, now
what?"
It
seems make sure has (at least) two
different senses. We'll come back to how that works.
A
useful and pervasive distinction is made between polysemy and homonymy
e.g. ring (wedding vs. boxing)
e.g. saw (see vs. tool)
But
it's more complicated than this - how do we determine when we're looking at two
related senses of a word and when we have to different words? Consider:
How
many senses are there evidenced above, and are they cases of polysemy or homonymy or both?
Ways to
have multiple senses of a word
The
same word can denote the same conceptual category in different frames
Different
conceptual categories that are members of the same superordinate
category
Different
conceptual categories that have perceived similar properties
Types
and subtypes
Different
aspects of the same frame (this is called metonymy)
Different
conceptual categories that are metaphorically related
The
problem with the polysemy-homonymy distinction is
that we need clear criteria for determining which is the appropriate
characterization.
An
experimental approach to polysemy versus homonymy
Stimuli: All the snow has melted now. spring [homonymy] hotel
[control]
In
the mountains, we refilled our canteens
My
dog is happy. tail [polysemy] motel
[control]
I
went to the back of the airplane
Results: Metaphorical
and metonymical polysemy showed stronger priming than homonymy (compare
the gray bars with the white ones for each of these categories).

What we
learn from polysemy