Ling 423/640G: Cognitive Linguistics
Ben Bergen
Assignment
4
Distributed:
November 5, 2008
Due: November 18,
2008
Instructions:
Please provide thoughtful yet succinct answers to the following
questions. Feel free to discuss the problem with your classmates, especially if
you are not a native speaker of English. But write up your discussion notes and
answers independently. [You only need to submit your answers.] Remember to put
the names of the people you worked with [and your own name] on your homework.
Double-space all work and use a font size no smaller than 12. Your entire
homework should not be much longer than three or four pages.
1. Some new constructions [6 points]
The
following sets of sentences each evidence a particular
grammatical construction. Your task is to describe this construction. You don't
have to use any particular notation, though if you'd like to use something like
the format we've been implicitly using in class, you may. You do not have to
perform a complete grammatical analysis for each sentence - just for the one
construction in common among all the utterances in each set. Make sure that for
each of these constructions you identify the following things if relevant:
i.
the
construction [give it an apt name]
ii.
constructional
constituents [a.k.a. slots]
iii.
constraints on these
constituents [like their form, meaning, or that they have to be a particular
word or other construction]
iv.
the meaning
contributed by this construction [stated in terms of constituents, if
applicable]
v.
the form of
this construction [including word order, prosody, or anything else not
contributed by its constituents]
To figure
out some of these constraints, you might have to work with some additional
sentences using the same constructions. If you're not a native speaker of
English, and potentially even if you are, it will be impossible for you to do
this without consulting with [other] native English speakers.
1. [a] What's this fly doing in my soup?
[b] Could you please tell me what that
scratch is doing in the living room table?
[c] What am I doing working on this
assignment the day before it's due?
2. [a] You have to hand it to him; those
unwashed leeks really make the soup taste earthy.
[b] I have to hand it to the comedian -
I didn't even see the punchline coming.
3. [a] Just because we live in Hawai`i doesn't mean we surf everyday.
[b] Yet, just because some people
cannot distinguish between serious and hypothetical risks hardly means that we
should spend all our time talking down to health consumers.
[c] The school board said that just
because there are 150 years of scientific evidence for evolution,
that does not prove that we are related to monkeys.
2. Some old constructions [4 points]
Sometimes,
different constructions can produce the same set of words, but with different
meanings. We saw an example of this with the John kicked the bucket example in class. For each of the following
sets of sentences, identify the two constructions that make the critical
difference between the two interpretations of each sentence. [Hint: there may
be one interpretation that's preferred with the punctuation I've given you -
look beyond this.] Make sure for each construction [that is, a total of four
constructions, two for each set] to do the same things as in part I; namely,
identify:
i
the
construction [give it an apt name]
ii
constructional
constituents [a.k.a. slots]
iii
constraints on these
constituents [like their form, meaning, or that they have to be a particular
word or other construction]
iv
the meaning
contributed by this construction [stated in terms of constituents, if
applicable]
v
the form of
this construction [including word order, prosody, or anything else not
contributed by its constituents]
1. [a] When Bob approaches the girls don't
pay attention to him.
[b] If John starts drinking your beers
disappear fast.
2. [a] Visiting relatives can be a pain.
[b] Flying planes used to be dangerous.