This unedited article first appeared in the Nov/Dec 1990 issue of Aquarium Fish Magazine

Reef Aquariums: A Feast for the Eyes

by J. Charles Delbeek In the last six installments of this series I have gone over some of the basics with respect to reef aquarium components and the organisms that inhabit them. I think it only fitting to conclude this series by showing you some truly successful aquariums that meet the criteria for a "true" reef tank that I set out in the first article. Namely, that they closely resemble a section of a coral reef with all the requisite organisms in a harmonious balance. Before I begin describing these systems I would like to briefly outline some of the factors that I personally feel are important in initially setting up a well-functioning reef system. These are my own opinions and are based on my experience as well as those of the owners of some of the systems described here. Your experiences may differ but I hope to convince you of the validity of these ideas by the systems described in this article. There are various methods employed today in setting up reef systems, many of which are successful; some more than others though (Sprung and Delbeek, 1990). However, I feel that the most important ingredient, the one that will ultimately determine the appearance of the system and the time taken to achieve that state, is the quality and amount of live rock used in a system. The reason for this is that it takes time for any system to reach a balanced state and the key to achieving this balance is the conditioning of the live rock. The better conditioned the live rock, the more stable the system. One method used to improve the condition of the rock is to let it sit in a unlit, well-filtered aquarium for at least a month (this is called "seeding" the rock). The rock is of course first stripped of all sponges and algae that could die-off and pollute the system. After about a month of seeding, the rock is placed into the intended reef tank. By seeding the rock in this way, any fouling organisms will have died off and the rock will have begun to develop significant encrusting red, pink and purple coralline algae growths. This rock is then used to build-up the basic structure of the reef. Specialized rock such as plant rock or anemone rock are not used until much latter, if at all. Seeding the rock in this way is not always practical for the hobbyist and we are often forced to place freshly collected rock into our systems. The removal of potentially fouling organisms becomes even more important in this case as the reef tank becomes the seeding tank. A complete description of the process of setting up a reef tank using seeded and unseeded live rock is given in Sprung and Delbeek (1990). The source of rock is another factor that should be taken into consideration. I prefer to use "reef rock", that is, rock that has been collected from reef areas. These consist basically of pieces of coral and coral rock that have been broken off of the reef during a storm and have fallen to the bottom, where they are then covered, over the years, by numerous encrusting organisms such as sponges and coralline algae. To my mind this type of rock makes the most beautiful and successful reef tanks. It also cycles very quickly and stabilizes the tank rapidly. Inshore rock tends to be denser and is usually covered with numerous macroalgae, clams, mussels, crabs, shrimps and other unwanted organisms; to my mind less desirable but still usable. I cannot stress enough the importance of the quality of the rock in having a successful reef tank. Whether you use a trickle filter or only skimmers to filter your tank is irrelevant, if you have good quality rock with very little die-off, this will have a much greater affect on water quality than the filtration system. I feel that the importance of the filtering capacity of live rock has been greatly down played, and that of the filtration system has been, perhaps, overrated. One of the reasons why I have come to this rather startling conclusion is based simply on the wide variety of successful systems I have seen filtered by various means. The only common ingredient has been the quality and amount of live rock used. Some aquarists talk of using calcareous tufa rock or other, non- calcareous, dried rock, however, I have yet to be convinced that a reef tank set-up in this manner ever comes close to a system using exclusively live rock. In addition, many reef organisms such as hermatypic hard and soft corals, require a calcareous base to settle on and do not colonize other surfaces very well (Stüber, personal communication, 1990). Once the live rock has been introduced into the system, especially when using unseeded rock, one should wait at least 6 months before introducing any more living organisms. In addition, for the first few weeks, it is best to keep the lights off as intense lighting will only accelerate the growth of undesirable algae during this period of high nutrient levels (especially when unseeded rock was used). The reason for waiting is that the tank will be undergoing a series of dramatic changes. These usually consist of various microalgae and diatom blooms that could last as long as 4 months or more, not to mention the nitrification cycle that occurs within the first few weeks. If you add corals etc. immediately, you may lose some specimens due to the microalgae. One could add macroalgae at this point if desired, to help cycle excess nutrients out of the tank quicker. After a period of 4-6 months you will notice that the tank will start to look very "fresh" and it will have a healthy "glow" to it. I'm sorry but I don't know how to better describe it. Those successful hobbyists out there will understand what I am talking about, it is almost as if one develops an empathy with their aquarium and can tell at a glance when things are going well or poorly. Once your tank has achieved this state it is time to start adding more organisms. Some start by adding a tang or two to help control algae growth while others suggest that fish should be the absolute last addition so that various organisms on the rock, and in the system, can have a chance to multiply. If you were to use well-seeded rock the times mentioned above would become dramatically shorter. The initial quality of the rock is also a very important variable in the cycling time. One often hears how quickly a tank cycled and how little ammonia was produced, the filter is often given the credit but I feel the quality of the rock plays a much more significant role than previously believed. How much rock should be used is a commonly asked question. The old rule of thumb has been 2 pounds of live rock/gallon. As I explained in my first article, I do not think that this is a viable rule due to differences in rock density (Delbeek, 1989). Another problem is that this old rule often results in people trying to cram in as much rock as possible to reach the "ideal" weight of rock. The danger in this approach is that water flow around the rocks becomes greatly restricted and detritus will eventually accumulate at the numerous contact points of the rock which could result in serious problems later. It is much better to build a loose arrangement of rock such that there is as little contact as possible between rocks and between rocks and the substrate. This will greatly facilitate cleaning and water quality as the tank ages not to mention better circulation of oxygen-rich water around the rocks. Don't forget, many of the specimens you will add later come on their own rock, so space allowances must be made for these too. Even with all these precautions it still takes time for a system to mature. This can take anywhere from 1 to 2 years. Yes years! One of my German pen-pals refers to a system less than 2 years old as "young". Once this "steady state" has been reached the system almost, other than routine maintenance, appears to run itself. A common symptom of this state is that the amount of ozone required to maintain a set redox value gradually decreases to extremely small amounts. I believe that all of the systems in this article have reached that stage. The first reef system I would like to present to you belongs to John Burleson (of J.P. Burleson Inc.). John has been an extremely dedicated hobbyist for over 10 years. In the last two years that I have been following John's aquariums I have been constantly amazed by the size, beauty and health of the organisms John has been able to keep and grow. His skill as an aquarist is irrefutable and is evident in the photos of his system. The aquarium is 150 gallons in capacity and is filtered by a twin spray bar Pisces trickle filter filled with Dupla Bioballs(TM). Ozone is injected into a small skimmer installed in the sump at a setting of less than 5 mg/hr, just enough to prevent the build-up of yellowing compounds in the water. Redox hovers around the 350 mV level. Additional filtration consists of a Tunze 215 power skimmer and activated carbon. Lighting consists of three VHO Philips actinic 03 and three VHO Sylvania daylight fluorescent lamps which come on and go off in stages. Water changes are performed on a monthly basis and freshwater, passed first through a reverse osmosis unit and then through a deionizing column, is used for topping-off evaporation. A chiller is employed to keep the temperature in the mid-70's. The only additions that John regularly performs, that I am aware of, are fish food and calcium chloride to maintain the calcium level for the corals and calcareous algae. None of the invertebrates are fed directly. The tank contains numerous soft corals (e.g. Xenia, Anthelia, Sinularia etc.), hard corals (Catalaphyllia, Trachyphyllia etc.), mushroom anemones (Discosoma sp., Ricordia floridans), gorgonians (Pseudopterogorgia sp.), tridacnid clams (Tridacna derasa, T. squamosa), leather corals (Sarcophyton sp.), zoanthids, various species of shrimp. Fish include a Red Sea Purple Tang (Zebrasoma xanthurus), a Red Sea Pseudochromid (Pseudochromis dutoiti), a mated pair of Ocellaris clowns (Amphiprion ocellaris), a Flame Hawk (Neocirrhites armatus) and several damselfish. The second system I would like to describe belongs to Mr. D. Stüber of Berlin, Germany. Mr. Stüber has been in the hobby for over 20 years and his system is representative of the so called "Berlin School" of aquarium keeping. Two 250 W HQI(Registered) metal halide lights (replaced every six months), supplemented with blue fluorescents (Actinic-type bulbs), are used on his 700 L aquarium. The lights come on and go off in stages over a 13 hour period. Filtration consists simply of a small overflow which drains into a sump. The sump contains a few small compartments for prefiltration and one for calcareous gravel in which denitrification is believed to occur. Water is pumped from the sump into 2 four foot air-driven skimmers (COMPLETELY cleaned everyday) from there it flows back into the tank. These skimmers were designed and built by hobbyists in Berlin and have been used for many years. Air is pumped into the skimmers such that a total of 700 L/Hr of air enters the skimmer which is approximately one litre/hour of air per litre of aquarium water. There are 6 Tunze Turbelle water pumps located in the tank itself to promote vigorous water movement (Stüber, 1989). There are basically two types of aquariums kept in Berlin; soft coral tanks and hard coral tanks; fish are more of an afterthought. Water chemistry is of utmost importance in both types of systems. Mr. Stüber's water chemistry parameters are as follows: pH 8.3, nitrate less than 10 mg/L, nitrite 0.05, KH 8, temperature 26oC and specific gravity 1.025 (Stüber, 1989). Somewhat surprising perhaps, is the redox which varies between 180 and 195 mV as measured with a silver calomel probe. However, it is very difficult to compare redox values from one tank to the next due to innumerable variables such as probe type and pH, so any comparisons between aquariums are almost useless. Ozone is not used in this system. Water changes are performed at the rate of 5% per month. Activated carbon is used every three weeks for a period of a few days and is then removed. Hair algae must of course, be totally absent before any hard corals are introduced to an aquarium. Macroalgae (Caulerpa taxifolia) are used to help keep microalgae under control as well as numerous snails, sea urchins, starfish (all of which help scavenge the aquarium too) and tangs, specifically the Yellow Tang, Zebrasoma flavescens (Stüber, personal communication, 1990). At present the system contains over 24 specimens of hard corals representing 11 different species. These specimens are all growing and spreading over the rock. Mr. Stüber uses both calcium hydroxide and strontium chloride solutions (see Sprung and Delbeek (1990) for detailed instructions on their use) regularly in his aquarium and you can easily see the results of these additions in the magnificent coralline algae growth and the remarkable hard coral colonies! Species of hard corals growing in this system include Acropora formosa (grows at the rate of over 2 cm/year), Echinopora lamellosa, Seriatopora sp., Porites sp., Millepora sp., Favites sp. and Pachyseris sp. (Stüber, 1989). The tank contains also Tridacna sp. clams, zoanthid colonies, mushroom anemones and other soft corals. The first piece acquired, Acropora formosa, was introduced into the tank in 1983 and was about the size of a quarter. Over the years various pieces were broken off and given to other hobbyists in Berlin. These "daughter" colonies have grown equally well (Stüber, 1990). The specimen of Pocillopora damicornis has been similarly distributed amongst hobbyists in Berlin. This coral has also spawned several times with one of the planula larva actually growing into a new colony. One point that Mr. Stüber makes quite clear is that no other corals, especially mushroom anemones (Discosoma sp.) and zoanthids, should be allowed to come into contact with these hard corals as they will sting the corals eventually killing them (Stüber, 1990). In the next artcile I will provide you with more information on the initial set-up of a reef system and we will look at the reef systems of John Payter, Mike Paletta, Julian Sprung, as well as my own.

References

Delbeek, J.C. 1989. Reef aquariums: An introduction. AFM 2(2):24-33. Sprung, J. and J.C. Delbeek 1990. New trends in reef keeping: Is it time for another change? Freshwater and Marine Aquarium 13(12):8-22, 180-184. Stüber, D. 1989. Wat doen ze daar in Berlijn eigenlijk? Het Zee-Aquarium 39(11):217-223. Stüber, D. 1990. Rifbouwende steenkoralen in het zeeaquarium/1. Het Zee-Aquarium 40(5):107-110.

This is a rather old article and should be taken as such. Although much of what I wrote back then still applies to today's systems, you should not take the recommendations as gospel .