Prior to doing any 2-3 page Reading Response, please read
the following: Readings
for this Class.
Pick a group (3 to 4 people in each group)
Spider-Man |
Secret-Identity |
The Watchmen |
A. Read Christopher Robichauld's "With Great
Power Comes Great Responsibility: On the Moral Duties
of the Super-Powerful and Super-Heroic" in T. Morris,
M. Morris, eds.' Superheroes
and Philosophy: Truth, Justice, and the Socratic Way
(Popular Culture and Philosophy.
|
B. Read Tom Morris' "What's Behind the Mask:
The Secret of Secret Identities," in T. Morris,
M. Morris, eds.' Superheroes
and Philosophy: Truth, Justice, and the Socratic Way
(Popular Culture and Philosophy.
|
C. Read Aeon J. Skoble's "Superhero Revisionism
in Watchmen and The Dark Knight Returns."
in T. Morris, M. Morris, eds.' Superheroes
and Philosophy: Truth, Justice, and the Socratic Way
(Popular Culture and Philosophy.
|
Discussion Questions that Might be relevant; for your Reading
Response, you may want to answer any 4 questions:
As much as possible, try to perform old-school analysis by
utilizing strong evidence incorporation; additionally play
with new-school analysis by potentially conducting external
research (especially including personal opinion)
A. Spider-Man
1. What are the struggles that Peter Parker endures that
particularly resonate with an adolescent or college-aged audience?
How is the fact that many people DON'T like Spider-Man, including
his own boss, different from other vantage points in the Superhero
universe? (e.g. how Superman is largely respected?)
2. Consider the lessons you were taught about being "successful,"
even as early as childhood. What were those lessons, and who
imparted those lessons? Given the utilitarian stance on page
181, do those early elements of "success" mesh well
with your current gauge of "success?" Are they different
or the same? Why?
3. What is the didactic purpose behind the author's discussion
of whether or not Jean Grey should save the passengers on
a bus thrown by Juggernaut at the cost of her own personal
health? What is the potential personal lesson that can be
discerned from this section (pages 182-83)? Are you engaged
in a similar situation in which you have divided sensibilities
in terms of your obligations to yourself/others?
4. Describe Kant's categorical imperative in your own terms
(184-85) after getting a sense of what it means to the author.
Then discuss the applicability of this imperative in your
own life and your conduct towards other people.
5. In the last section of the article, there is a strong
discussion of the obstacles which superheroes face in cultivating
and maintaining relationships. Imagine that you have some
super-powers. How do these super-powers affect, if not impede
your relationships with a girlfriend or boyfriend, wife or
husband?
B. Secret-Identities
1. Discuss the various masks you wear in different contexts,
if at all. For example, when you are at work, what mask do
you wear? When you are at home, what mask is it? When you
meet new people? What is the utility of the masks that you
don at every different context in your life?
2. Discuss the utility and design of the costume that is
worn for 2 fictional male heroes. How does the form (design)
of the costume increase or influence the function (purpose)?
(For example, in most cases, as discussed in the animated
film, The
Incredibles, shouldn't a cape be seen as a major
impediment towards fighting crime?)
3. Explain how gender plays a role in costuming. For example,
using the 2 male heroes depicted above, discuss how their
costuming choices are largely difference when compared to
two female heroes/villains. In essence how did the costuming
decisions change or shift due to the genders of the characters?
4. How might you relate the cultivation of a secret identity
to the lives of celebrities involved in papparazzi culture?
In other words, why do celebrities wear baseball caps
and sunglasses and all sorts of "bad fashions" so
as to cultivate an entirely different ethos? Why
is "Clark Kent" an effective secret identity for
a celebrity like Superman?
5. Citing textual evidence, how are Batman and Superman a
seeming yin-yang amongst superheroes? Who or what
is your yin or your yang? Why?
C. Watchmen/Dark-Knight
1. When Frank Miller wrote The Dark Knight Returns,
traditionalist fanboys were outraged. When movies like Harry
Potter do not conform to the readers' expectations of how
Harry should look or behave, readers get outraged. How is
superhero revisionism subject to the whims of the audience?
How does revisionism affect reader response to CHANGES in
the text?
2. On page 35 of the article, the author cites Nietsche's
quote: "Whoever fights monsters should see to it that
in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze
long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you"
(qtd. in Skoble 35). How is this particular quote applicable
to a police officer? Batman? A character in The Watchmen?
How is the quote potentially applicable to any individual?
3. In The Watchmen, Ozymandias is a highly compelling
character in that he acts in a utilitarian manner to achieve
a seemingly utopian goal. What makes Ozymandias flawed? What
makes him famous? What makes him a hero?
4. The author raises a fantastic question on page 38 about
whether any one entity, person, group, or nation, should serve
as a watchman or overseer: "Could anyone ever be trusted
to occupy the position of a watchman over the world?"
What do you think?
5. There are many modern analogues regarding people needing
to become monsters in order to combat monstrosity, especially
in an age of global terrorism. What is your stance? Do we
need to fight fire with fire, carve out an alternate path,
such as diplomacy—if you were a member of a blog or
message board advocating how to deal with terrorism in the
world, what would you advocate?
|